The advocates of girl suffrage haven’t any interest whatever on this question, as it is idle to suppose that it might develop into a practical one. We go to the structure of the State to settle this query, just as we would to settle the query whether or not the governor’s time period is one yr or two, or whether or not the judges hold office for a time period of years’or for life. It was perfectly easy for the people, if they had so desired, once they had been adopting a structure, to make families and not individuals the depositaries of political power, however they selected to present the facility to people, and thus the question is totally settled for the State. It provides you with exactly what you ask for, but not at all times what you want. The political basis of the State is the need of the despot. The proposition that the household is the basis of the State thus taken by itself is entirely false; but even when true, the use made of it as an argument towards giving suffrage to ladies is equally fallacious. And when it thus arises, it comes up wholly with reference to a particular State, and not as an summary query.
The individual is made the voter-not the household-and that’s the entire query. It’s decisive on this point that not a single representative government, so far because the author knows, has adopted the idea that the family and never the individual should vote. When one is advocating the theory that the household must be the political foundation of the State, he is just saying that the constitution must be amended and the right of voting taken away from people and given to families. It is true, the State doesn’t perform utterly its personal principle, however this was its concept, and what it did was wholly on this route and away from the household idea. A legislation peculiar to Russia offers its villages, within the management of their local issues, the fitting of voting by families-an ideal illustration, on a really small scale, of the household because the political foundation of a State. Here the individuals aren’t the political foundation of the State, either as families or as individuals.
Whether it is ‘right’ for their idols to stay ‘modern’ and have sexual intercourse with every man who takes their fancy, the teenagers are led to believe there isn’t a sin concerned in living ‘modern’ additionally. But here lady suffrage is admitted as a essential end result; and where there is no such thing as a man to symbolize the family, or he’s unable to attend, the lady of the house casts the vote. The constitution merely secures the suffrage to certain classes, and there leaves the matter. IV. Rule Of Construction.-The constitution declares that the article of its institution is to secure the blessings of freedom to the folks (Preamble, Revised Statutes, vol. Court of Appeals, 1858, People vs. Court of Appeals, 1863, Bank of Chenango vs. In 2015, John Lewis, a pacesetter of the civil rights movement and a chairman of the SNCC, welcomed the result of the landmark civil rights case of Obergefell v. Hodges wherein the Supreme Court of the United States struck down all state bans on identical-intercourse marriage, stating that “races don’t fall in love, genders do not fall in love-folks fall in love”. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the comfort of the reader.
It is just the place the individuals of the State have the entire or part of its political power, that the question can presumably arise as to whether individuals or households are its political foundation. While considering whether or not either of these provisions ought to be adopted, we are dealing with a matter proper for opinions and argument, but when the provisions have been adopted, the whole query becomes one among fact, and we glance only to the structure to find out it, and deal with it as a matter not for dialogue but for absolute ascertainment. After which it is wholly a query of reality, not one in all political philosophy; a matter for easy ascertainment, not for speculation and reasoning. Indeed the question is unmeaning when put as an abstract one. This can be proven by a single illustration, We will suppose there are two families, in each of which the father dies, leaving in one case a widow and one son, and in the other a widow and six daughters. The son whom we’ll suppose to be of age, goes to the polls and we are going to suppose sufficiently represents the household to which he belongs; but the place is the household representation for the other widow and her six daughters?